scinexic logo icon
Scinexic banner logo
Scinexic.com tag line
scinexic logo icon
Scinexic banner logo
Scinexic.com tag line
scinexic logo icon
Scinexic banner logo
Scinexic.com tag line
scinexic logo icon
Scinexic banner logo
Scinexic.com tag line

The SciNexic Space Sci-Fi Spotlight

The SciNexic Space Sci-Fi Spotlight

The SciNexic Space Sci-Fi Spotlight

Enter our monthly Spotlight section, where we embark on a wild journey through the seldom charted galaxies of space science fiction!

Entry 16: Jupiter Ascending (2015) – A Grandiose Space Opera That Stumbles Over Its Own Epic Scope

Jupiter Ascending dazzles with immersive world-building and cutting-edge visual effects but gets tangled in its overambitious narrative, earning a ★★★☆☆ SciNexic rating.

Plot & Themes

Jupiter Ascending, directed by Lana and Lilly Wachowski, hit theatres on February 6, 2015, as a high-budget interstellar epic from the minds behind The Matrix . The film follows Jupiter Jones (Mila Kunis), a down-on-her-luck Chicago cleaner who discovers she is the genetic reincarnation of an alien matriarch destined to inherit Earth. Thrust into a deadly cosmic inheritance battle, Jupiter must navigate the labyrinthine politics of the powerful Abrasax dynasty—Balem (Eddie Redmayne), Kalique (Tuppence Middleton), and Titus (Douglas Booth)—who exploit planetary populations for profit.

Guided and protected by Caine Wise (Channing Tatum), a genetically engineered warrior with lupine enhancements, Jupiter is forced to confront questions of identity, free will, and the commodification of life itself. The film layers fairy-tale motifs (a Cinderella-to-princess arc) atop hard-sci-fi concerns—genetic engineering, immortality, and interplanetary oligarchy—yet critics found the thematic ambitions often outpaced by an overstuffed script .

Visual & Production Design

At its heart, Jupiter Ascending is a visual feast. Production designer Hugh Bateup collaborated with Territory Studio to fuse practical sets—ornate palaces, retro-futuristic urban sprawls—with vast rear-projected backdrops, creating seamless environments that feel both regal and otherworldly . Cinematographer John Toll captured these vistas in rich, saturated colours, giving each planet its own visual identity.

The centrepiece of the film’s design is the Titus Clipper, a three-kilometre-long interstellar yacht. Framestore’s digital-arts team built the Clipper with over a billion polygons, making it one of the most complex single assets in cinematic history . From its sweeping hull curves to the delicate filigree at its command bridge, the Clipper epitomizes the film’s grand scale. Costume designer Kym Barrett likewise blended classical silhouettes with alien biomaterials—Balem’s fur-lined robes and Jupiter’s evolving wardrobe underscore their characters’ contrasting arcs.

VFX Techniques & Behind-the-Scenes

Visual effects play a starring role in Jupiter Ascending.
CGI & Compositing: Framestore, Rising Sun Pictures, and Method Studios handled over 1,500 VFX shots, compositing live-action plates with fully CGI worlds . The filmmakers leaned heavily on green screen and chroma-key stages to place actors into sprawling alien courts and zero-gravity combat sequences.
Digital Mattes & Miniatures: To ground the fantasy in realism, miniature models were shot alongside live sets, then blended with digital extensions—a nod to classical filmmaking techniques revived for the 21st century.
Practical Effects & Stunts: Channing Tatum and cast members performed wire-work for zero-G fights choreographed by second-unit director Antony Ginandjar. Explosions and set-piece crashes used real pyrotechnics, enhancing on-set energy and giving the actors genuine reactions.

Behind the camera, the production faced immense logistical challenges. Five months of pre-production storyboarding mapped every VFX shot. On set in Chicago and London, dozens of reference markers and LED panels ensured consistent lighting for post-production integration. The Wachowskis’ insistence on practical stunts wherever possible led to numerous on-set injuries—Mila Kunis reportedly sustained a minor ankle sprain during a wire harness rehearsal .

Performances & Characters

Mila Kunis brings warmth and tenacity to Jupiter Jones, portraying her transformation from grungy apartment cleaner to reluctant galactic heiress with believable force . Channing Tatum’s Caine Wise combines brooding stoicism with flashes of humour, although some critics found his performance “monotonal” in quieter moments .

Eddie Redmayne’s Balem Abrasax is perhaps the most divisive element: part cosmic despot, part theatrical buffoon. Redmayne leans into the role’s eccentricity—high-pitched glee one moment, venomous rage the next—splitting critical opinion between “brilliantly unhinged” and “laughably over-the-top” . Tuppence Middleton and Douglas Booth provide polished support as Balem’s siblings, adding familial tension to the power struggle. Sean Bean and Douglas Booth appear in smaller roles that flesh out the Abrasax dynasty’s darker recesses.

Reception & Impact

Upon release, Jupiter Ascending polarized critics and audiences. Rotten Tomatoes reports a 28% approval rating, noting its stunning visuals but criticizing its “convoluted plot and wooden dialogue” . Metacritic’s aggregate score of 40/100 reflects similar ambivalence . Peter Bradshaw of The Guardian praised the film’s

“genuine moments of wonder”.

The Hollywood Reporter called it

“an ambitious misfire,”

lauding the production design while lamenting the lack of emotional grounding .

Financially, the film grossed $184 million worldwide against an estimated $176–210 million budget, underperforming relative to its high costs and extensive marketing campaign . Home-media sales and streaming have since boosted its revenue, but it never achieved blockbuster status.

Legacy & Fan Engagement

Despite—or perhaps because of—its flaws, Jupiter Ascending has cultivated a passionate cult following. Online forums dissect its mythology, debating unanswered questions about the Abrasax economy and the fate of secondary characters. Fan art, speculative podcasts, and cosplay communities celebrate the film’s visionary design and ambitious scale. In 2021, a fan-funded petition for a director’s cut garnered thousands of signatures, highlighting enduring interest in the Wachowskis’ cosmic universe.

Trivia buffs note that the film’s mythos draws on Joseph Campbell’s hero’s journey and subtly references The Odyssey (Jupiter’s name) and The Wizard of Oz (a puzzled heroine in a strange land) . The Wachowskis’ attempt to elevate space opera to arthouse reflection makes Jupiter Ascending a frequent case study in film schools studying the balance between spectacle and story.

Conclusion

Jupiter Ascending stands as one of the Wachowskis’ most daring experiments in modern space sci-fi. Its panoramic vistas, inventive VFX, and larger-than-life production design offer a feast for the eyes, even if its narrative occasionally loses orbit. As a ★★★☆☆ SciNexic Spotlight entry, it reminds creators and audiences alike that the line between cinematic ambition and overreach is as thin as air in the void of space.

A rendered image of a black and event horizon
A rendered image of a black and event horizon
A rendered image of a black and event horizon

Entry 15: Greenland (2020) – A Tense Race Against Catastrophe. SciNexic Rating: ★★★★☆

Greenland (2020) plunges audiences into a gripping disaster thriller that fuses intimate family drama with the immense terror of a cosmic catastrophe. As a comet hurtles toward Earth, the film channels the spirit of space sci‑fi by exploring a very real apocalyptic threat that tests humanity’s resilience and the bonds of family. Unlike traditional space adventures filled with starships and interstellar battles, Greenland offers a grounded perspective on global disaster—one that resonates with fans of space sci‑fi who appreciate realistic, character-driven narratives.

A Plot of Survival and Family Bonds

At its heart, Greenland is a survival story that follows the Garrity family as they navigate a crumbling world with a comet named Clarke threatening to obliterate everything. John Garrity (Gerard Butler), a stoic structural engineer, must reconcile with his estranged wife Allison (Morena Baccarin) as they struggle to safeguard their young son Nathan (Roger Dale Floyd). Their desperate journey to reach a government shelter in far-off Greenland becomes a poignant exploration of personal sacrifice, reconciliation, and the raw drive to survive in the face of overwhelming odds.

Director Ric Roman Waugh encapsulates the emotional core of the film when he remarks,

"What I love about Gerard is he's fearless in showing his own vulnerabilities and sensitivities—elements that come from the truth of his own life".

This focus on family dynamics, set against the backdrop of impending cosmic doom, elevates Greenland beyond the standard disaster flick and into the realm of heartfelt space sci‑fi storytelling.

Visual Spectacle and Technical Execution

Despite a modest $35 million budget, Greenland harnesses its resources to deliver a series of visually arresting sequences that capture the terrifying beauty of an apocalyptic event. The production made effective use of ARRI ALEXA Mini cameras, creating a sense of immediacy and raw realism in its portrayal of destruction. From the fiery trails of comet fragments crashing into cityscapes to the chaotic evacuation scenes, the film’s visual effects are both impactful and restrained—serving the narrative rather than overwhelming it.

The filmmakers strategically blend practical effects with digital enhancements to construct a believable apocalyptic environment. The diverse locations—from the urban sprawl of Atlanta, Georgia to the stark, icy vistas of Iceland—contribute to a rich, textured portrayal of a world on the brink of collapse. This attention to technical detail is particularly appealing to space sci‑fi aficionados who value a realistic depiction of cosmic disaster, where every explosion and collapse feels earned.

Direction and the Balance of Tension and Emotion

Ric Roman Waugh directs Greenland with a steady hand, emphasizing tension without sacrificing the emotional depth of the narrative. His approach is to balance high-stakes set-pieces with moments of quiet introspection, allowing the audience to connect with the characters on a deeply personal level. In Greenland, every burst of on-screen action is interwoven with the internal struggles of the Garrity family, making the global catastrophe feel intimately personal.

Waugh’s direction is marked by a clear understanding of pacing—he creates a relentless forward momentum while providing breathing room for character development. This nuanced rhythm keeps viewers on edge, mirroring the relentless advance of the comet, while also offering poignant, heartfelt moments that underscore the film’s thematic core of human resilience and love in the shadow of disaster.

Stellar Performances Amid Chaos

The emotional weight of Greenland is carried on the strong performances of its cast. Gerard Butler steps beyond his traditional action-hero persona to depict John Garrity as a flawed yet fiercely determined father. His portrayal is layered, capturing the subtle interplay of guilt, determination, and vulnerability that underscores his character’s journey.

Morena Baccarin lends considerable depth to Allison, imbuing the role with a mix of strength and tenderness that reflects the complicated dynamics of a relationship under stress. Meanwhile, young Roger Dale Floyd’s performance as Nathan adds an essential layer of innocence and palpable fear—a reminder of what hangs in the balance when humanity faces extinction.

Critics have praised the cast’s ability to make this large-scale disaster feel deeply personal. One review noted,

“Gerard Butler’s performance reveals dramatic depth beneath the action hero veneer; it’s a moving portrait of a man forced to confront his past and fight for his family’s future”.

Such performances are critical in a film where the spectacle of cosmic destruction might otherwise dwarf its human story.

Production Trivia and Behind-the-Scenes Challenges

Creating an apocalyptic narrative on a constrained budget posed unique challenges for the Greenland team. The production navigated numerous hurdles, from coordinating complex visual effects sequences to managing logistics during a volatile shooting schedule that spanned multiple locations. Filming during the summer of 2019, followed by rigorous post-production work during the COVID-19 pandemic, tested the ingenuity and determination of everyone involved.

Director Ric Roman Waugh has reflected on these difficulties:

"The sheer complexity of executing the disaster scenes, combined with the budgetary constraints we faced, was a testament to our team’s dedication. Every visual effect, every location shoot was a balancing act between ambition and realism."

Such challenges not only underscore the film’s raw authenticity but also highlight the creative resourcefulness that defines modern space sci‑fi filmmaking.

Critical Reception and Enduring Legacy

Greenland received generally positive reviews from critics, earning an 83% rating on Rotten Tomatoes—a nod to its successful blend of intense drama and meticulous technical craft. The film’s focus on intimate human drama amid widespread calamity resonated with audiences during unpredictable times, as viewers found both solace and caution in its portrayal of survival.

Box office performance was respectable as well, with the film grossing approximately $52.3 million worldwide despite its challenging release environment. Critics have lauded Greenland for its restrained yet impactful approach; one noted,

"Greenland isn’t just about the spectacular; it’s about the human spirit fighting against unimaginable odds."

This enduring thematic relevance ensures that Greenland continues to spark discussion among fans of both disaster films and space sci‑fi narratives.

Final Verdict: A Gritty, Character-Driven Disaster Thriller

Greenland (2020) stands as a compelling entry in the disaster film genre, one that prioritizes human stories amidst an epic cosmic threat. While it diverges from traditional space sci‑fi adventures with starships and alien encounters, its exploration of a global catastrophe triggered by a comet aligns with the genre’s broader fascination with the unknown and the uncontrollable forces of nature.

The film’s strengths lie in its balanced direction, impressive technical execution, and powerful performances that draw audiences into a narrative of survival, sacrifice, and redemption. Though it may not boast the extravagant budgets of some blockbuster disasters, Greenland’s intimate focus on family and the human condition makes it a uniquely affecting cinematic experience.

For fans of space sci‑fi and disaster thrillers alike, Greenland offers a potent reminder of what truly matters when facing the end of the world: the strength of human connection and the relentless drive to survive.

SciNexic Rating: ★★★★☆
Greenland is a tense, character-driven disaster film that marries intimate family drama with the awe-inspiring terror of a cosmic threat—a must-watch for those who appreciate grounded, thought-provoking space sci‑fi narratives.

Load More

Stellar
Signup

Stellar
Signup

Stellar
Signup